|Canterbury Christ Church University UniLearnO is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
|Subject Code :
In response to doubts concerning whether Lantau Tomorrow Vision will "deplete the coffers", the government has revealed a preliminary estimate of the cost and returns of the project. The announcement marks the transition of the artificial island initiative from a conceptual to a practical discussion. With no end to ideological disagreements in sight, the government this time has chosen to break from usual practice and reveal cost estimates before completing the related studies. Although concern will inevitably arise regarding whether the figures are accurate or not, initiating practical discussions is, after all, an important starting point. All parties should base their discussion on facts, trying more to cite data and facts rather than engage in vague discussions. Since many Hong Kong infrastructure projects have experienced significant cost overruns in recent years, the public is worried that the same mistakes will be repeated. The authorities must learn the lessons and keep project costs under control. Still, they should not go so far as to give up the long-term planning of infrastructural development because of that potential risk. Hong Kong needs to develop sustainably. For the sake of weighing up the pros and cons of the artificial island proposal, the only way is to launch a feasibility study so as to facilitate an in-depth discussion in society.
The idea of sustainable development emphasises that environmental protection and development are not mutually exclusive. At the beginning of this century, the Netherlands implemented the Maasvlakte 2 development plan with the support of the European Union. About 2,000 hectares of land was reclaimed for the expansion of the port of Rotterdam while a series of ecology and conservation programmes were also conducted correspondingly at the same time. Sticking blindly to the ideological perspective and entangling oneself in the either-or debate of land reclamation versus environmental protection will never offer us a way out....
1. Evaluate the evidence for making a decision either to proceed or not proceed with the Lantau Tomorrow decision.
2. What does the case tell us about the processes of strategic decision making in light of the discussion in chapter 9 of the set text (i.e. Clegg, Theory and Practice second edition)
This MBUCC3STM - Strategic Management Assignment Help has been solved by our Strategic Management Experts at Unilearno. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
Eureka! You've stumped our genius minds (for now)! This exciting new question has our experts buzzing with curiosity. We can't wait to craft a fresh solution just for you!